这家公司为了向OEM销售这套E2E无人驾驶系统,保持独立性,不接受OEM的投资,特斯拉FSD对外licensing遇到对手了:$特斯拉(TSLA)$ $英伟达(NVDA)$ $比亚迪(SZ002594)$
In a Q&A with Hyperdrive, Alex Kendall, Wayve’s co-founder and chief executive officer, compared and contrasted the tack he and Elon Musk are taking to developing this technology. Here are the highlights from the conversation, which are edited and condensed for length and clarity:
It’s a big funding round. How long have you been working on it?
The answer is, a decade. From some of the early AI breakthroughs we made at Cambridge University that showed how it was possible to work 网页链接{without an HD map} and then building out the company. We still had quite significant runway from our Series B, but decided in the fourth quarter to go out and fundraise because the technology got to a point that you saw today.
What will you spend the money on?
People and compute. We’re not going to blitzscale the company. We are disciplined. One of the things that’s been important is making sure we’re being smarter and not harder in terms of we don’t just brute-force solutions — we look for innovative, creative ways to build things efficiently. So we’ve got a fairly lean team today relative to others in the space.
Our big push into automotive came when we were really happy that the tech started to work, call it, a year ago. We’re very careful not to overhype. All of this is setting the right expectations.
How do you plan to deploy the technology?
We 网页链接{don’t want to own and operate} the vehicles. We want to make sure that we can build the safest and more generalizable embodied AI here. By aggregating data over many manufacturers, we can train an AI that is safer than any one can do on their own. And so, we very much want to take a partner-first approach here. We want to build an open platform that can support and give the automotive industry flexibility and choice of how best they want to take advantage of this AI technology.
The best manufacturers are 网页链接{investing in data collection} today. We can’t succeed on our own, and neither can the automotive industry – we’ve both got different expertise. The systems and product manufacturing expertise of carmakers and the data understanding and AI on our side bring these things together.
Did automakers want to invest?
We saw a lot of interest for investment from OEMs, but at this stage, because we are partnering with a number and endeavoring to build an AI that can produce the most and generalizable performance by working with a number across the industry, we wanted to remain neutral in that regard. So we saw a lot of interest for it but we’ve decided to, rather than partner up with one OEM, work more collaboratively with the industry.
How far away are you from launching the tech with carmakers?
We’re not releasing specific launch timelines at this stage. But we’re busy working with a number of manufacturers toward this point and it’s going to be an exciting day when it comes.
Why will your approach win out?
We’ve been all in on an end-to-end AI approach since we started in 2017, and were unique in doing so. It was fun to see Tesla last year pivot to this approach. It’s nice for them to join the club. We’re seeing more and more evidence that AI is what’s going to enable the benefits of autonomous driving to come to the world — certainly, that’s the trajectory we see things on. But the hundreds of billions of dollars that have been invested in this space 网页链接{have gone the other way} so far.
Do consumers want driverless cars?
The experience is magical when you sit in it and try it. It’s pretty clear the errors humans make while driving, and the stress it causes. This technology can really evolve. The key thing is that we need to deploy it responsibly, so making sure we have the appropriate driver-monitoring systems that mean it’s not misused.
But the experience is remarkable. I think consumers haven’t yet had the ability to taste this at scale, but it’s clear that the stress, the inefficiency, the risk and safety challenges that we see in driving, these are real value-adds for society, and it’s an imperative we get this technology out quickly.
Is regulation moving quickly enough?
Regulation is moving well. It’s awesome to see 网页链接{the bill} in the House of Commons in the UK at the moment and weeks away from coming through, so we’re really pleased to see that. In general, the world is moving quickly to enable this technology, because it brings such a transformational impact to society.